The Effect of Social Media Intensity on the Religiosity of Students
Keywords:
Social media; Religiosity; StudentsAbstract
This study aims to analyze the effect of social media usage intensity on the religiosity of students at MA Attanwir Talun. A quantitative approach with a correlational design was used. Data were collected through a closed questionnaire administered to 120 respondents and analyzed using Pearson's correlation test and simple linear regression with the aid of statistical software. The results show a negative and significant relationship between the intensity of social media use and student religiosity (r = -0.462; p < 0.05). The coefficient of determination (R² = 0.213) indicates that 21.3% of the variation in religiosity is influenced by the intensity of social media use. The regression equation obtained is Y = 4.215 - 0.378X, which means that an increase in the intensity of social media use is followed by a decrease in religiosity. This study concludes that the intensity of social media use contributes to students' religiosity, so it is necessary to strengthen character education and religious digital literacy to maintain a balance between the use of technology and spiritual commitment.
Downloads
References
Adeyemi, S. B. (2012). Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Students : A Mandate for Higher Education in Nigeria. 3(2), 155–161.
Baier, F., Decker, A.-T., Voss, T., Kleickmann, T., Klusmann, U., & Kunter, M. (2019). What makes a good teacher? The relative importance of mathematics teachers’ cognitive ability, personality, knowledge, beliefs, and motivation for instructional quality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 767–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12256
Bandura, A. (1985). Prentice-Hall series in social learning theory. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (2020). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. Routledge.
Cleary, T. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2017). Motivation and self-regulated learning influences on middle school mathematics achievement. School Psychology Review, 46(1), 88–107.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design. In Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (pp. 53–106). Sage Publications, Inc.
Dent, A. L., & Koenka, A. C. (2015). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 425–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8
Flanagan, A. M., Cormier, D. C., & Bulut, O. (2020). Achievement may be rooted in teacher expectations: examining the differential influences of ethnicity, years of teaching, and classroom behaviour. Social Psychology of Education, 23, 1429–1448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09590-y
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
Geng, S., Law, K. M. Y., & Niu, B. (2019). Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(17), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0
Glynn, S. M., & Winter, L. K. (2004). Contextual Teaching and Learning of science in elementary schools. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 16(2), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173645
Grassl, R. & Mingus, T. (1996). Using Technology to Enhance Problem Solving and Critical. Mathematics and Computer Education, 31(3), 293–300.
Hiemstra, R., & Brockett, R. G. (2012). Reframing the Meaning of Self-Directed Learning: An Updated Modeltt. Adult Education Research Conference Proceedings, 155–161.
Honey, M., & Marshall, D. (2003). The impact of on-line muti-choice questions on undergraduate student nurses’ learning. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE), 236–243.
Ismayilova, K., & M.Klassen, R. (2019). Research and teaching self-efficacy of university faculty: Relations with job satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.08.012
Kleij, F. M. van der. (2019). Comparison of teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment feedback practices and association with individual student characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85(1), 175–189.
Li, S., & Zheng, J. (2018). The relationship between self-efficacy and self-regulated learning in one-to-one computing environment: The mediated role of task values. The Asia-Pacific Educ. Res., 27(6), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0405-2
Mahvelati, E. H. (2021). Learners’ perceptions and performance under peer versus teacher corrective feedback conditions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100995
McQuarrie, E. F., & Krueger, R. A. (1989). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 371. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172912
Ocak, G., & Yamaç, A. (2013). Examination of the relationships between fifth graders’ self-regulated learning strategies, motivational beliefs, attitudes, and achievement. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(1), 380–387.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Chapter 14 - The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning. In Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Duncan, T., & Mckeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ).
Pressley, M. (1995). Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers, and policymakers. HarperCollins College Publishers. http://www.lib.muohio.edu/multifacet/record/mu3ugb2619716
Reichert, F., Lange, D., & Chow, L. (2021). Educational beliefs matter for classroom instruction: A comparative analysis of teachers’ beliefs about the aims of civic education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 98(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103248
Roick, J., & Ringeisen, T. (2018). Students’ math performance in higher education: examining the role of self-regulated learning and self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 148–158.
Vonkova, H., & Hrabak, J. (2015). The (in) comparability of ICT knowledge and skill self-assessments among upper secondary school students: The use of the anchoring vignette method. Computers & Education, 85, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.003
Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: where metacognition and motivation intersect. In Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 299–315).
